Contact Us for a Free Consultation 504-828-3313

Updates

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt - Louisianans Overwhelmingly Vote to Require Unanimous Verdicts.

Posted by Megan Kiefer | Nov 07, 2018 | 0 Comments

Louisianans have overwhelmingly approved Constitutional Amendment No. 2, meaning that all felony convictions in Louisiana will now require a unanimous guilty vote from all twelve jurors. The amendment enjoyed bipartisan support, and passed with a resounding 64% of the vote.

               In approving the amendment, Louisiana voters abolished a law dating back to 1898, and brought Louisiana in line with every other state in the US; other than Oregon. The amendment will not take effect immediately, and will only apply to crimes committed on or after January 1, 2019.

               The original bill which was introduced by state Sen. JP Morrell, did not initially appear to have much chance of passing. However, strong bi-partisan support for the bill ultimately carried the day, and allowed the amendment to go to Louisiana voters. In fact, a number of lawmakers acknowledged that they had not planned on voting for the bill until they heard the arguments of Republican Senator Dan Claitor, a former assistant district attorney.

               Sen. Claitor acknowledged that when he served as an assistant district attorney in the 1980's, there was a practice of filing more severe felony charges in order to avoid having to get a unanimous verdict which have would have been be required for a conviction on the lesser charges which have a juror of only six and required a unanimous verdict. In essence, he explained that district attorney's were so concerned about avoiding a unanimous verdict requirement, that they would perform an end run to avoid it.    

             The bill, and ultimately the proposed amendment, were strenuously opposed by most of the state's district attorney's who attempted to spin the amendment as a danger to public safety by allowing criminals to go free.

               However, Louisianans saw through that fear mongering, and recognized that the amendment instead merely recognized the full extent of one our most important constitutional protections, requiring that a defendant be found to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and not by 10 jurors out of 12.    

About the Author

Megan Kiefer

Megan Kiefer is a partner at Kiefer & Kiefer. She is a trial attorney who specializes in personal injury, insurance defense, and appellate work and who has a proven track record in and out of court. Megan has experience as lead counsel in jury trials, judge trials, and mediations, as well as exte...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

CONTACT US

We are happy to provide you with a free consultation on your case.

The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.

The transmission and receipt of information contained on this Web site, in whole or in part, or communication with Kiefer & Kiefer via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between us and any recipient. The material on this website may not reflect the most current legal developments. The content and interpretation of the law addressed herein is subject to revision. We disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site to the fullest extent permitted by law. Do not act or refrain from acting upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

Menu